I have been
following the rapidly evolving world of estate planning for digital assets for
some time, partially confused and concerned by the myriad of laws and competing interest in this area.
Part of
this arose from trying to help the family of a deceased client deal with a
truly awful post-mortem issue with Facebook.
I came
across an excellent article in the February issue of the Nashville Bar Journal by Nashville attorneys Jeff Mobley and Laurie
Parker called “Heartaches by the Numbers:
Estate Planning for the Digital Age”.
The piece gives an excellent overview of the current positions of such
companies as Facebook, Google and Twitter in dealing with the representatives
of deceased users. But the article brings
up so many other issues. For example, what does one do with online
photo albums such as those hosted by Tumblr, Instagram and Flickr? What about online money that may be held in a
PayPal account? What about an iTunes
library? What about a domain name? The authors really help pull all of these
disparate issues into perspective.
They also
point out that at least seven states have enacted legislation that gives personal representatives legal
unfettered access to a deceased person’s digital accounts and that Tennessee is
considering such legislation.
The most
helpful part of the article is the author’s suggested language for powers of
attorneys and wills giving fiduciaries and executors specific authority to deal
with these issues. I plan to incorporate
these clauses into my documents going forward and to recommend updates to some
of my more social media active clients.
I’m also
going to warily compile a list of my own digital assets such as they are, just
to make sure that my digital presence doesn’t linger much longer than my
temporal presence. Again, my thanks to
these authors for making this complicated subject seem manageable.
No comments:
Post a Comment