As anyone who has read my little blog over the past few
years knows, I have a real interest in alternate methods of music distribution. I also have a professional interest in
crowd-sourced funding, since many clients of mine have experimented with it to
various degrees. Finally, I am a huge
fan of Frank Zappa, for many different reasons.
So, I was fascinated with the recent announcement from
Frank’s widow, Gail Zappa of a new distribution concept intended to raise
approximately $1,000,000.00 needed to complete a video release of Frank’s 1973
concerts at the Roxy Theater in Los Angeles.
Apparently these shows were professionally filmed as well as recorded
(Zappa fans know the original album “Roxy and Elsewhere”).
Gail has asked “1,000 highly motivated sensitive and
discerning individuals” to become distributors of the audio soundtrack of the
concert. According to Gail’s press
release those individuals who contribute $1,000.00 to the Zappa Family Trust
have the right to distribute the recording of the concert however they see fit,
except that these so‑called distributors
have to pay the trust mechanical royalties and report their sales to them.
This concept is interesting but fatally flawed. In this environment of internet piracy free‑for‑all
(probably imagined by Frank at some point) there is no way that the patrons of
this cause are going to make any actual money selling the recordings and if
they do, the average fan is going to be ill-equipped to know how to go about
reporting and paying mechanical royalties.
Hell, it’s difficult enough to get record companies to do this. What
happens if they don’t pay? Does the Zappa trust sue them?
I may be wrong, there may be 1,000 Zappa fans worldwide
who will pay $1,000.00 for the privilege of being an exclusive Zappa
distributor and if so this is the apex of the crowd funded money raising model
but I don’t think that will be the case.
Still kudos to Gail Zappa for trying something new. It’s nice to see that Frank’s legacy as an iconoclast
lives on.