I probably know less than my dog about bitcoin and block chain technology. Like Nick Paumgarten says in his recent New Yorkerarticle, "The Stuff Dreams are Made Of," "I'd ideally hoped I might be just old enough to make it to my deathbed without having to get up to speed." But I really did want to try and understand blockchain technology and what the hell everybody else in the world seemed to comprehend except me. For a primer, I read Paumgarten's article. He does a good job of explaining the concepts and the players involved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac130/ac130ed2a22f302d1b940d544b58e1a41f898d0e" alt=""
This set up an ethical debate: could or should the people behind the fund reverse the transactions to restore the investors to their funds - or would this be "a violation of the principle that blocks must remain immutable?" In the terrestrial world this would be an obvious crime.
Then the article gets really interesting:
We were all wondering is code law? What is code? What is law? What is the covenant? It was almost epistemological. We were a bunch of computer geeks way out of our depth.
I thought about this for hours. We really are witnessing the creation of a whole new society and a new set of laws to govern that society. This is a world that exists without traditional concepts of jurisdiction. It is easy to lump this into a discussion of the internet, social media , Russian hackers and all of the other inventions that have morphed into something we could not have comprehended. But I really believe that this might be the beginning of something entirely unique and it does give us an opportunity to watch laws develop.
However, I still don’t get the allure of bitcoin.
No comments:
Post a Comment