data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/800c3/800c35f9ddc7ba13dd9f5e605833278ae0bc1a70" alt=""
My friend, journalist
Tom Wood told me about a lawsuit that’s recently been filed in state court here
in Nashville: Donaldson v. Keaton. I don’t
know the parties but it is essentially a lawsuit filed by an aggrieved songwriter
from Ohio against a Nashville song plugger he had retained to pitch his songs.
The
complaint is a model of legal drafting being both informative, educational, fact
laden and persuasive. The plaintiff,
Donaldson has sued for fraud, promissory fraud, a violation of the Tennessee
Consumer Protection Act, breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation. Over
207 separate paragraphs, the plaintiff’s attorney carefully lays out a case against the song
plugger, Keaton. am keeping a copy of
the complaint on file for future reference.
It is hard
to know what really happened in this case but one can imagine what might have
transpired to lead to this dispute. I
will say that the one part of the
complaint that was kind of chilling is found in Paragraph 23: Plaintiff
started to get suspicious in mid‑2014 about whether Keaton was providing
services as agreed to because no results were being obtained after
approximately 16 months of paying Keaton for services.
Therein is a
hard truth – plugging is an occupation where with even the most talented writer
and the most connected and reputable song plugger – it might take more than
16 months to get a tangible result.
One might never get the results.
I have been on both sides of this issue and I don’t see any simple
solutions but it does bring to mind the old cliché: “You must be present to win”. Most writers (and artists) who achieve any
kind of success in Nashville do so by being present in this town – working,
networking, keeping their ears to the ground.
I think that this kind of long-distance business relationship described
in the complaint is fraught with the potential for miscommunication and
misunderstanding.
No comments:
Post a Comment