I am a practitioner of trademark law and I can attest that it is often a sea of angst and
confusion. I'm also a fan of both the
late Captain Beefheart and the late Frank Zappa … there's a little bit of angst
and confusion there as well.
Thus, I am fascinated by the fact that Zappa's widow Gail
just secured a notice of allowance on her intent to use application for the
trademark "Captain Beefheart" (Serial No. 85695177). (I have written about Gail Zappa before: http://tripaldredgelaw.blogspot.com/2012/12/selling-zappa.html).
Ms. Zappa is seeking registration in several U.S.
classes that include everything from "audio and video recordings" to "electronic
games software" to “sunglasses”. (Captain Beefheart sunglasses ?
Cool!).
I don't claim to know the whole complicated history
between Don Van Vliet (p/k/a
Captain Beefheart) and the Zappas.
I know that Don and Frank were high school friends, I know that Zappa
released Trout Mask Replica and I know that there was some legal wrangling
over the original master recordings to
the album Bat Chain Puller which was recorded in the 1970’s but which went
unreleased until 2012.
I can't tell how Zappa would have acquired the rights to
the trademark in sound recordings and
other classes for the Captain.
California has a very good right of publicity statute which would seem
to give Vliet’s heirs a right to exploit
his name, image and likeness after his death. What about all of the other Beefheart
recordings that were released on labels
other than those controlled by Frank Zappa?
There may be a simple explanation to all of this and the explanation
may be that it is none of our business.
Or it may be one of those interesting areas where the laws of
intellectual property and state property
and probate laws intersect. Stay tuned.
2 comments:
Sounds personal. Like maybe it's just another good old rock&roll grudge.
Sounds personal. Like maybe it's just another good old rock&roll grudge.
Post a Comment